Teton Realty Blog

Teton Region Real Estate Market Stats, Articles & News

  • Home
  • Listings ‘N Stuff
    • Property Search
    • Search Account
  • The Blog
    • Buyers
    • Sellers
    • Local Info
    • Market Reports
    • Know Your Home
    • 2022 Teton County, ID Code
    • Pages & Categories
  • About/Contact Me
    • Contact Me
    • About Me
    • Testimonials
  • Log In/Subscribe
    • Account Set-Up/Log-In
    • Weekly Newsletter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Wetlands, Simplified

April 8, 2024 By Tayson Rockefeller Leave a Comment

In a previous post, I provided an overview based on my experience working with a local wetland consultant when it came to wetland. Recently, when clarifying some county regulations directly with the Army Corps of Engineers, I was able to get some additional generalized data that may help provide a simplified overview of wetlands; when a delineation is required, and restrictions to consider. The long version of this article is probably better for those looking for an understanding as to what wetland is and how it is identified. The purpose of this article is to provide a guideline for those looking to understand regulations. As always, this information is subject to change, particularly with the changing landscape at the local government level. In addition, this is my own interpretation of my discussion with the Army Corps office, an obviously there are likely some third party communication statements in here. In short, verifying information across all fronts is always advised.

As mentioned in my prior article, wetland is generally identified by soil composition, vegetation, and the presence of water. In the absence of indicative vegetation or soils, a basic guideline is the presence (or lack thereof) wetland can be indicated by water within 18 in of the surface for at least two consecutive weeks out of the growing season. According to the Army Corps representative I spoke to, the growing season can depend on the year, but usually runs from April through mid-July.

Currently, Teton County’s position with respect to wetland is that one can obtain a building permit without specific wetland research such as a wetland delineation if they are at least 100 ft from the current hydrography boundary as provided by the county. Keep in mind that this boundary does not necessarily indicate wetland, but rather the county’s interpretation of wetland based on the data they are using.

If one desires to build closer than 100 ft estimated boundary, this is usually when the Army Corps takes a role. Historically the Army Corps has provided consultation as to whether or not a delineation (a study to determine the actual boundary of wetlands), however, both the county and the Army Corps has begun to move towards requiring delineations as opposed to providing findings based only on consultation.

Once a delineation is completed, and a boundary of wetland has been defined, Teton County shifts their 100 ft required buffer from the estimated boundary to 50 ft from the actual boundary of wetland. Whether or not this remains the regulation for years to come at the county level is yet to be determined, but for all intents and purposes, this is the current guideline.

Not all properties will have a wetland boundary and in other words, may be entirely consisting of wetland. Alternatively, an area of upland may be entirely surrounded by wetland. In these events, the Army Corp’s position would likely prefer crossing wetland to reach the area of upland. In the event of no upland, a general rule is that up to 1/10 of an acre may be set aside without mitigation.

In the event that 1/10 of an acre on any given property entirely identified as wetland is not conducive for a project, mitigation can often be required. This usually consists of designing a project to replace the wetland implicated by the project. This might occur on the subject property, or on another property.

For those interested in purchasing properties with indicated wetlands, providing ample time to gather appropriate information can be important, as well as making sure to set aside the time needed to perform the research including the possible delineation work prior to commencing with any project. Special circumstances may apply. As an example, a property impacted by flood irrigation that may not otherwise be considered wetland could take one, or even 2 years to dry the property to its natural state and prove that it is not in fact upland but rather indicators of wetland were present as a result of irrigation water, as opposed to wetland habitat. These specific timelines including research during a growing season or a multi-season review can make negotiating on real estate challenging. It is often unrealistic to ask for inspection timeframes with ample time to complete these studies. As a result, many consumers need to take a calculated risk approach based on the information available.

City of Driggs Area of Impact Draft

March 14, 2024 By Tayson Rockefeller Leave a Comment

The City of Driggs held a public hearing on March 13th to present a proposed new area of impact overview to the Driggs Planning and Zoning Board. While the state statute on adopting area of impact is vague, the City of Driggs is hoping that their plan will align with the county as they have been working together on the project. The current plan would still need to be approved by the city council before being presented to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC).

An area of impact is an area outside the limits of City Driggs in county jurisdiction. It is an identified area of unincorporated County land outside of a city limits. The area is defined and agreed upon by both city and the county. The area is under the county’s jurisdiction, however, specific plans and ordinances are agreed upon by both the city and the county that dictate annexations and other planning and zoning procedures.

Most applications in this area for development would require a joint meeting between the city and county planning and zoning departments.

The proposed amendments to the area of impact are generally expected to decrease. The only area expanding from the previous impact area is to encompass the wastewater treatment plant area on the West side of the City along Bates Road. The revised and proposed boundary are areas that are reasonably expected to be annexed into the city in the next 10 years, though the primary focus will be the wastewater treatment plant and ends of the airport runway as necessary with an already approved runway shift, which is a large consideration as part of the amended area of impact.

Properties outside of the area of impact can still request to be annexed into the city, but any areas outside of the proposed boundary the city would not be able to annex under their current plan.

Tributary is expected to be required to annex before future development of additional phases of the development can occur.

The new Driggs area of impact land is intended to have its own effective land development code when fully adopted. It will have specific zoning districts under the county’s jurisdiction specific to these areas.

Teton County Land Development Code Amendments – Workshop

March 13, 2024 By Tayson Rockefeller Leave a Comment

A workshop has been underway to redline several items in the Teton County Land Development Code (LDC). This review and workshop is ongoing, stay tuned. Please note that much of the information below is an interpretation of the March 12th Planning and Zoning meeting, always verify information with Teton County, Idaho and the most recently published Land Development Code. Just because items below are listed, does not mean that they will be amended. Items that were redlined in the review document (linked here) are in BOLD below.

Teton County has noticed grammatical errors in general errors from public and county staff. Two work sessions were held to review those items with the planning and zoning commission in January 2024 and the county commissioners in March of 2024.

– inaccurate numbers and citations
– table revisions edits in clarifications
– confusion as to when permits are needed
– beekeeping
– ADUs including ADUs in the IR zone (When the new land development code was passed a previous amendment was missed allowing up to two attached ADUs in the IR zone district
– application procedures, land division review and short plat errors
– scenic overlay changes

Notes on the most discussed topics are listed below.

Setbacks
A red line was made with respect to uncovered or unenclosed porches or debts awnings etc that may extend into a required front or side setback up to 2 ft or up to 6 ft into a rear setback. Previously unclosed patios, decks, balconies, porches and so forth were able to encroach into a side or rear setback up to 10 ft. This is likely to avoid issues relative to properties with small setbacks.

Beekeeping
Commercial beekeeping is now defined as 16 hives or larger and discussion about not requiring commercial permits for fewer than 16 hives. Further clarification on what defines a hive (a box, or a stack) was recommended.

Campgrounds
Campgrounds were further defined as campsites with individual water, sure, and or electrical hookups for 2 to 60 tents, recreational vehicles, cabin sites, or travel trailers.

Accessory Dwelling Unit, Attached
Redlines were added in the IR Zone district to accommodate two attached units as an ADU, a code update previously approved prior to the new code, but not included in the final revision to the new code, an inadvertent oversight. The maximum size of the ADU shall not exceed 1500 ft² for either one or two units. The applicant will need to provide verification of wastewater treatment system based on Teton counties septic capacity evaluation form. Applicant is responsible for any fees associated with reviews. ADUs may not be short-term rented in the IR Zone district.

Employee Housing
A controversial element suggested in the code was that the number of employees per unit shall not exceed the number of bedrooms. Planning and zoning commissioners argued that this standard should be limited by fire code requirements or square footage requirements by other entities. *This seemed to be of the greatest concern for the planning and zoning board. Discussion was made to strike this and revert to the septic capacity limits.

Application Subject to Final Decision by the Administrator
As noted below, Scenic Corridor Reviews was added to the list of items that may be at the discretion of the Administrator, more on this is reviewed below.
Temporary Uses
Limited Uses
Agricultural Land Divisions
Sign Permits
Scenic Corridor Reviews
Boundary Line Adjustments, and
Modifications to a Temporary Use

Temporary Uses – Expiration and Revocation
Temporary use permits may not be used in place of a special use permit for an ongoing use – effectively limiting anything more than 180s consecutive days to a special use permit.

Short Plat Land Divisions
The review procedures for the short plat land division process were changed

Preliminary Plat Review
A review criteria was added stating impacts presented from any studies requested related to natural resource overlays, economic impacts, or traffic studies.

Expiration
The application for final plat must be submitted within (previously 36) 24 months of the date of the BOCC’s final decision on the preliminary plat.

Floodplain
Floodplain requirements were amended to be aligned more closely with FEMA requirements.

Grading and Drainage
Amendments were made to the grading and drainage section to add requirements but also intended to reduce the number of permits for special work running through the county. Concern about existing code language including requirements for grading and drainage permits when driveways are elevated more than 6” from existing grade were questioned by the Planning and Zoning Commissioners. Development of an agricultural exempt building, as determined by the building official may now require a grading and drainage permit was also in question.

Riparian Buffers – General Development Standards
Additional language was added to general development standards for any development activity within riparian buffers.

Wildfire Hazard Areas
Small modifications to fuel brakes were discussed and Planning and Zoning Commissioners suggested professional opinions before implementing further changes.

Scenic Resource Protection
*This was an important aspect of my consideration based on special requirements for those close to scenic corridors including State Highways and Ski Hill Road. A general statement was added in applicability that Permits to develop within the scenic corridor may be approved administratively if all development standards are met. At the discretion of the planning administrator, any applications that do not fully meet the standards will require a public meeting to review the application and the planning and zoning commission who will act as the decision-making body.

Submittals
Additional submittals in the section were added for site plans, applications, including the latest recorded deed to a property, affidavits of legal interest if applicable, and landscaping plan including height of landscaping and plant species.

Summary
The Planning and Zoning moved to recommend approval with conditions with a condition to strike the redline limit on employee housing occupancy and continue discussions on defensible space and grading and erosion.

A Short and Sweet Update on Targhee Expansion Plans

February 2, 2024 By Tayson Rockefeller Leave a Comment

It’s always in and out of the rumor mill, so I decided to attend a Board of County Commissioners meeting jointly between Teton County Wyoming and Idaho – Grand Targhee is an inholding in Wyoming surrounded by National Forest, but accessed from Driggs, Idaho.

Teton County Idaho’s Rob Marin gave an overview of the expansion proposal plans which included:

– A new lift North of Blackfoot to supplement the existing Blackfoot lift, and a new lift South of Dreamcatcher to supplement the Dreamcatcher lift.
– A proposed restaurant at the top of the Dreamcatcher lift with 6,000 square feet of space, including 3,000 square feet of open deck.
– A proposed restaurant at the top of the Sacagawea lift with 6,500 square feet of space, including 2,000 square feet of open deck.
– An additional phase, referred to as the “Mono Trees,” which includes approximately 6,000 acres of expansion below the recently installed Colter lift, as well as additional expansion South of the Colter lift referred to as the “South Bowl” expansion.
– Tree grading (or removal) and snowmaking, which would be a first for Grand Targhee.
– Converting the main Dreamcatcher open lift to a gondola hybrid AKA “chondola”.

The revised expansion proposals have come on the heels of the recently installed Colter lift which was previously designated as a cat skiing area. Concerns expressed by those on the Idaho side included water consumption for snow making and wildlife migration in the proposed Mono Trees and South Bowl expansion areas. Teton County, Idaho also expressed support of Grand Targhee Resort as an economic partner, but affirmed concerns about the scale of the proposal and its impacts. The largest public concerns included wildlife, scenery, traffic and parking, social economic impacts such as housing, labor supply and public services as well as recreation impacts including those impacts to backcounty skiing.

A link to the county meeting can be found here.

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 45
  • Next Page »

Recent Testimonials

  • Douglas V.
  • Chuck M.
  • Terry & Joy K.
Teton Valley Realty
Copyright Teton Realty Blog© 2025 - Tayson Rockefeller - [email protected] - 208-709-1333 - sitemap | Privacy Policy, Copyright & Terms of Use