Teton Realty Blog

Teton Region Real Estate Market Stats, Articles & News

  • Home
  • Listings ‘N Stuff
    • Property Search
    • Search Account
  • The Blog
    • Buyers
    • Sellers
    • Local Info
    • Market Reports
    • Know Your Home
    • 2022 Teton County, ID Code
    • Pages & Categories
  • About/Contact Me
    • Contact Me
    • About Me
    • Testimonials
  • Log In/Subscribe
    • Account Set-Up/Log-In
    • Weekly Newsletter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Covid-19 and its effects on our Market (May 2020)

May 7, 2020 By Tayson Rockefeller Leave a Comment

In general, I have moved away from market updates when it comes to my real estate blog. We are moving those updates over to the brokerage. If you’d like to receive both, sign up on Teton Valley Realty’s website. I’ll always include the latest blog post. I want to try to keep all of the content for these posts relevant for as long as possible, and markets can change on a moment’s notice. This market update will definitely go down in the history books, so I think it’s appropriate.

The real estate market has remained surprisingly active. I seem to be working harder than ever – you know, when the going gets tough… as they say. I am doing a TON of videos and virtual tours, and surprisingly, have found pretty good success with “sight unseen” contracts. It definitely feels like the younger generation buyers have slowed and taken the issue with a little more concern. On the flip side, older generation buyers have ramped up with an increase in contacts, showings and contracts. I might be making this up, but to some degree, it makes sense. Younger generation buyers probably have more of our local tourism-related jobs, which have been hardest hit. The past several years of expansion have been great for almost everyone, but it would seem that the younger crowd probably hasn’t had as many opportunities to capitalize as those taking advantage of expanding markets and real estate values. On an interesting side note, the younger generation also seems to have a greater level of concern with respect to social distancing and being very careful about guidelines. This seems to contradict what we are hearing in the National news about younger people getting back to everyday life, or ignoring recommendations.

If you know me, I stay away from predictions. If I do make them, they are information-based, and never definitive. That being said, I’m going to guess we are going to see a continuous stream of people hoping to move away from populated areas and into rural America. If it were me, this is the first place I would look. I have read National Real Estate resource predictions of home values dropping 2-4% if things get back to “normal” soon, and 5-6% if things move slower in terms of recovery. I predict that it is less likely that rural areas will see contraction, but if they do, it will be further down the road – probably months after urban areas see an impact.

How many vacant building sites are there? (Really)

November 14, 2019 By Tayson Rockefeller Leave a Comment

I’ve been reading a number of articles lately referencing the impact all of the development in the late 2000s had on Teton Valley. Many of these articles compare today’s potential problems with those of the subdivision development era. Glampgrounds, RV parks, and certainly any further land development have been targets, often for good reason. While I agree that the amount of development that occurred in the late 2000s was extreme, I believe that the perceived impact and comparison to some of these other projects is also extreme, and in many cases exaggerated. I’ve heard numbers from 7000 to 16000 undeveloped building lots in Teton Valley which off the cuff, sounded high to me. So, I decided to investigate.

My first thought was that I would have to find a list of the available subdivisions, add up the number of lots in each, and subtract lots with improvements. This seemed like a daunting task. Fortunately, I learned that Rob Marin, the county’s extremely talented GIS coordinator had already done the heavy lifting. He based his analysis on subdivision lots, which is exactly what I would have done. After all, the purpose of the comparison and root of the problem is indeed subdivision lots. He determined (with a small margin of error) that there are 8,454 subdivision lots in the county, and that 3106 had improvements as of the date of Rob’s study, leaving 5,348 vacant subdivision lots in the county.

***Now might be a great time to read one of my past articles, With so many available building sites, why is it so hard to find what I am looking for?

Admittedly, this sounds like a lot. It is a lot. The question is, and point of my article; is the number of vacant building sites really as detrimental and overwhelming as it appears and is made to sound? Here are a few points from the devil’s advocate, speaking in generalities.

1) Some subdivisions really do, in my opinion, exist in a vacuum. What happens in or with them really doesn’t have very much impact on the rest of the real estate market. Example: Tributary, FKA Huntsman Springs. There are roughly 500 vacant building sites in Tributary. This is almost 10% of the 5,000 vacant building sites mentioned. The same goes for many other large-scale developments such as River Rim Ranch. Could it be construed that these developments are problems in and of themselves? Sure. However, if real estate prices plummeted, or skyrocketed in Tributary, I don’t feel it would have a major impact on the rest of the real estate in Teton Valley.

2) We know that roughly 65% of the available building sites are vacant, or at least have no improvements. There are approximately 300 subdivisions in Teton County. For the sake of making a point, imagine that each of them has roughly 25 lots. Each of those have 8 or 9 houses. A few of those own the neighboring lots. This isn’t the case, but it puts things in perspective.

3) Teton Valley is big. If you start breaking this down by quadrant, for example, the southeast corner of the valley (better known as Victor) doesn’t really have a problem as there are relatively few subdivisions with little to no improvements. Things are much closer to the scenario I outlined in point 2 above, if not better. Yes, I know there’s a counterpoint to every point I’ve made here. Some of the big subdivisions that are mostly vacant are considered to be the biggest part of the problem. The issue isn’t necessarily consistent across the board as mentioned in point 2, and while things are looking pretty good in Driggs and Victor, Tetonia has a huge ratio of some of these subdivisions with very few, or no homes at all. In any case, it is what it is. They are what they are, and they’ll sell when they sell. We can’t take away land from those who invested in a piece of Teton Valley just because we now recognize that things got carried away a decade ago. As a final point, throughout the course of my career, there have always been approximately 500 building sites on the market at any given time. I suspect that isn’t going to change anytime soon, so I’m not particularly worried about extreme changes with respect to value. The key takeaway is that there are a few (several) problem subdivisions out there. However, in most cases they are being farmed, waiting for their moment to become a neighborhood. I believe in responsible growth, and hope we can learn from mistakes relative to oversupply and over-development, but I hope past mistakes don’t prevent Teton Valley from growing responsibly.

Is it a good time to buy?

May 15, 2019 By Tayson Rockefeller Leave a Comment

Any good economist, salesperson, or real estate agent will always tell you up front; “I don’t have a crystal ball.” I don’t view this as a disclosure to cover one’s rear, but more a statement to get you thinking about both sides of an equation. With that, I don’t have a crystal ball, but I am going to do my best to make a recommendation.

Home prices continue to rise, the real estate market is booming, but these cycles don’t last forever. Even in times of recession, history shows us that markets recover, and thrive. I have to remind people that those who purchased a home in 2007 would very likely be in good shape today. We witnessed one of the deepest recessions in American history, yet here we are, 10 years later. If you would have purchased a home in 2007, your interest rate likely would have been somewhere between 6 and 7%. This seems high, but based on the past 50 years, it’s not bad. Sure, there are other equations. Those with an 18% interest rate in the early 80s could have refinanced over time. They also may have experienced a higher rate of appreciation.

Regardless, for the first time in history, rates have been below 5% for nearly 10 years, and this probably won’t last forever. The rate of inflation will likely increase as the strong economy continues, which will result in increasing interest rates to create balance for that rising inflation.

With that, I’m going to run a quick hypothetical. Let’s say you are buying a home and obtaining a loan for $400,000. The interest rates for a 30 year loan today are favorable, in the low 4% range. I’ll use 4.25%. The total cost of the loan, if you didn’t make any additional payments, would be about $708,000 over 30 years. Now, let’s say home values come down. You are able to buy the same home for $350,000 in a few years’ time, but interest rates are 6%. The total cost of the loan is $755,000 in this scenario.

To be fair, the above scenario isn’t totally realistic. Most people don’t own a home for the entire duration of their mortgage. I believe the median tenure living in a home is somewhere around 10 years. If we run the same scenario, and add up the payments over those 10 years, your balance owed at the end of 2030 with the first scenario would be around $300,000 and $280,000 in the second scenario. If you were to take into account the payments you would have made (as opposed to renting) between buying a house now, and if, and when the prices reduce in the future, you would likely be in the same boat. Things would also begin to swing in your favor the longer you own the home.

We don’t know if prices will decrease. We also don’t know if interest rates will rise. For all we know, home prices could come down along with interest rates, or home prices could increase along with interest rates. If trends continue, the latter is more likely to happen. If I run the same scenario with an increased purchase price and a higher interest rate, things get ugly.

We all have our own budget, limits on what we should spend, or even circumstances where it is not the right financial move to invest in a home. Do your best to weigh the pros AND cons. Educate yourself with respect to current interest rates, home prices and values. If it all adds up, then yes, it is my opinion that it is the right time to buy.

A Huntsman Springs Update

April 16, 2019 By Tayson Rockefeller Leave a Comment

For those of you reading the news, you probably noticed some significant changes planned for the Huntsman Springs development. In a nutshell, they are to:
-Consolidate a variety of parks scattered throughout the project into one large 7.5 acre public park at the entry of Huntsman Springs across from the Teton County courthouse.
-Add acreage to the project, but lower the overall density of the project to include larger ranch-style acreages on the North end of the development.
-Privatize internal streets with gates, and take over the maintenance of these streets.
-Solidify a location for future employee housing for the project.
In a public hearing and city council meeting on April 10th, there were obviously some concerns with the public. The public was in favor of the consolidation of the parks and overall density reduction of the project, though some were opposed to the privatization of the streets. A number of homeowners in the community East of the proposed employee housing also expressed concern.
It was concluded that the project amendments would be granted preliminary approval with the contingency that a final determination is made with respect to the location and accessibility of the employee housing site, amongst a few other clerical items as required by the city and county.
Though some expressed concern regarding the privatization of the internal roads, it was concluded that the benefit of overall maintenance reduction would be reduced significantly, even with the future maintenance required for the proposed park to be built in phases over three years.
I’ll be interested to see how the development changes. I am speculating a name change, and I understand we will see an increase of amenities for members.

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • 18
  • Next Page »

Recent Testimonials

  • Douglas V.
  • Chuck M.
  • Terry & Joy K.
Teton Valley Realty
Copyright Teton Realty Blog© 2025 - Tayson Rockefeller - [email protected] - 208-709-1333 - sitemap | Privacy Policy, Copyright & Terms of Use