Buyer Tips Archives - Page 9 of 25

Measuring the Value of Land by Price per Acre

November 28, 2021 By Tayson Rockefeller Leave a Comment

I have been meaning to draft this article for quite some time, it is one of those articles that’s relevant in any market. That is, valuing a particular piece of property based on a cost analysis per acre. This is a measure that we will sometimes use when valuing large farm acreages. For us working in the industry, that’s usually where it stops. For others, that methodology trickles down into residential property which in my opinion, is usually not appropriate. I share this opinion with most when discussing values, but usually when customers, be it Buyers or Sellers, start forming their own opinion it’s hard to get them to change their perspective. For Buyers, it’s a way of arguing the value down, and for Sellers the opposite. I’ve heard this a few times…

Anyway. A local analogy I often use as an example is a development between Driggs and Victor. It’s really one large interconnected development with two phases, but it was organized as two separate adjoining developments that share the same rules and regulations. The East half/development comprises 2.5 acre lots and the West half comprises 1 acre lots, but there’s a catch – an important one. The current county density requirement in this area is one home (and guest home if the subdivision allows) per 2.5 acre parcel. The average density of the East development is obviously 2.5 acres. The West development also has an average density of 2.5 acres. Each 1 acre parcel is surrounded by community-owned open space that cannot be developed. Currently on market is a $190,000 1 acre parcel and a 2.5 acre parcel nearby priced at $109,000 per acre. Does that mean that the one acre parcel surrounded by open space is only worth $109,000? Obviously not.

Okay, so the above example is easy to justify. Let’s move across the valley into the Teton View corridor. To keep things fair, we need to keep the area similar. Properties East of State Highway 33 should be valued differently than those West of side of the highway. Let’s compare parcels in developments with no open space, one parcel being 2 acres and another being 5 acres. Am I saying each of these have the same value? No, but they certainly could. What I am saying is that if I were asked to value each of these parcels I wouldn’t even look at the cost per acre (yes, I would look at the overall size) of nearby listings or sales. The important thing to remember here again is that each parcel allows ONE primary home. I could compare 2.5 acre parcels with 5 acre parcels in the primary view corridor all day long and would probably find more 2.5 acre parcels that I would recommend to customers regardless of overall price or price per acre. I’m going to look at budget, proximity from the highway, property features, overall development value and restrictions and of course, the viability of an unobstructed view down the road. In other words, is it conceivable that I would value a 2.5 acre parcel and a 5 acre parcel the same? Absolutely. Does it mean I don’t take the size of a parcel into consideration? No, it does not.

The important thing to understand when determining or justifying the value of any given tract of vacant land is to remember to look at the entire picture. A 2.5 acre parcel overlooking 200 acres of an adjacent development’s open space has tremendous value. Trees, creeks, undulation in terrain, community features and amenities AND size – all of these elements should dictate the value of a parcel. It is not fair or reasonable to value any given property using just one of these metrics.

Updating your Insurance Policies

September 30, 2021 By Tayson Rockefeller Leave a Comment

One of the tools we use to protect our real estate investments includes insurance policies. The obvious one is your homeowners insurance. With both real estate values and construction costs going crazy, we often overlook the level of protection we have in the event of a catastrophe. If you acquired your home more than a year or two ago, it’s definitely time to revisit this.

Even more overlooked includes title insurance. In fact, many of us don’t even realize that we have a title insurance policy. That’s because title insurance policies are issued once, usually at the time you purchased your property. To reiterate a few of my past articles, title insurance is a form of insurance designed to protect lenders and homeowners from financial loss due to a defect in title. Policies are issued to lenders for the loan amount and owners for the purchase amount. Defects in title can range from errors in the public record to liens on the property and a huge variety of other issues related to your home’s title and its history.

So, if you’ve been issued a policy at the time you purchased your property, why update it? Much like your homeowners insurance policy, we have to establish a value to base the policy. If you are insuring your 800k home for only 400k, you’re only covered up to 400k in the event of an incident. Title insurance works the same way. When a title insurance policy is issued, it’s usually for the original purchase amount. If you purchased your property more than a few years ago, chances are that you’ve seen a significant increase in the value of your property. If a defect is found or if one arises, it’s important to remember that you’re only covered for the original amount of your policy. This can be especially concerning for those improving their properties.

When it comes to updating your homeowners insurance policy, it’s usually just a quick phone call to your insurance provider. In most cases they are aware of the market conditions and can easily make adjustments. Increasing insured amounts is not unusual in markets like these, but it will add to the annual premium cost. Updating your title insurance policy can also be done, but it will sometimes require additional information to justify the increase in value. If you are refinancing the property the appraisal is an easy solution. However, even if you aren’t in the process of refinancing, your property’s assessed value with the county can be enough to increase the limits on your title insurance policy. Similar to your homeowners insurance, this will add to the premium, but remember that title insurance is a one-time expense, so the added premium will only be paid one time. In order to update this you will need to contact the title insurance company that wrote the original policy. If you don’t remember who this was, you can usually reference your deed or contact your real estate agent who should have a record of this for you.

Backup offers – a good idea?

August 29, 2021 By Tayson Rockefeller Leave a Comment

This is a contentious one amongst real estate agents. Before I get into that thought process, let’s go over the mechanics.

You’ve listed your home, you had a number of good showings and two great offers. Of course, you can only choose one. The other buyer presents a backup offer with a “backup addendum” accompanying the offer. It’s a short agreement, and it basically states that your agent will give them notice if the first buyer terminates. Things will then commence in accordance with the terms of their offer as soon as they receive that notice. If they have a deadline for an inspection, to deposit earnest money or provide a pre-approval letter, the clock won’t start ticking until that notice of the first position offer terminating is provided. Essentially things automatically roll right into the second offer.

Usually, a buyer’s agent is always an advocate for a backup offer because the buyer can terminate the backup offer up until the notice is given, at any time. Basically, there’s no risk. This is exactly why some agents agree that accepting a backup offer is a detriment to a seller. Why not just go back to the market and potentially receive more offers?

When acting as listing agents, we sometimes get used to increasing markets so it’s easy to make this advice. However, (in my view) there are still a few good reasons to consider a backup offer if a buyer wants to present one.

1) As agents, we try, but don’t always take a seller’s emotions into account like we should. I can tell you that listing a home in today’s competitive market is exhausting. We sometimes field dozens (even hundreds) of calls, texts, emails, social media notifications, the list goes on. It also doesn’t matter the day of the week or the time of the day, and we juggle a huge number of showings and showing requests. With all of the craziness, we sometimes forget that the seller oftentimes endures some of the same challenges. Keeping the house clean, ready for showings, juggling kids, dogs, life. In addition, making decisions can be tough. Good agents don’t tell you what your decision should be (sometimes we try to inform sellers of bad ones), they lay out the options, pros and cons in an organized fashion, answer questions and provide advice. The point is, a backup offer can create a calm environment and segue into a new transaction without going through all of the trouble again.

2) There’s an old saying that your first offer is always your best offer. However, in today’s crazy market it is not unusual for buyers to fire off quick offers with even quicker response times before the “bidding war” begins. In this context I’m not suggesting the very first offer is the best offer but rather the first group of offers is usually your best group of offers – if that makes sense. The more time that homes spend on the market, whether they are available or have an accepted contract, the more buyers assume there is room to negotiate. There are exceptions to every rule and that would include the points above. Of late, we have seen home values rise even during the time of which homes are in contract, but that seems to be subsiding. To bring this full circle to the market today, things appear to be leveling off (not dropping) in this new plateau appears to be a baseline for home and land prices, at least for now. This is all the more reason to consider these points, and to seek good real estate advice with these fast moving and ever evolving markets.

Changing the way we negotiate

May 3, 2021 By Tayson Rockefeller Leave a Comment

I distinctly recall hearing stories from customers in different areas of the country before the recent real estate boom changed the real estate world, particularly in rural areas. Stories about negotiations pushing home prices 10% over the asking price seemed pretty crazy to me, but in some cases, here we are.

It’s important to look at the date on this article, this information is likely going to be accurate only for a few months, but it’s good to earmark where things have been. I’ve got articles from 2014 with much different advice.

Price: Asking prices and offer amounts seem to change weekly, if not daily in this market. With the lack of public sale information and the unknown as to how far things are selling over the asking price this one’s hard to nail down without the advice of an agent that is in the thick of current trends. I have seen sale prices anywhere from $5,000 to 15% over the asking price depending on the sector of the market. We will usually see significant increases over asking on condos and townhouses, but that does not preclude any other type of Real Estate depending on the initial asking price. I should also note that some things are still selling under, it’s all about the tactic of the seller.

Finance and Appraisal: This one has been incredibly tough for buyers looking to get into the market. It’s frustrating and disheartening when a finance contingency is holding up the ability to compete with cash buyers. As a result, we’ve seen buyers agree to waive appraisal contingencies, assuming they have the cash balance to cover the difference. Waiving appraisal contingency and providing a pre-qualification letter with 5% down is difficult, but we haven’t seen too many problems with appraisals. Appraisers seem to be in the know with real estate prices. However, cash is still king, and hard to compete with as mentioned.

Inspection: Fortunately we haven’t seen a shift in our market where buyers have been (or need to) waving inspection contingencies in order to compete. Deposits that are immediately non-refundable are rare, and personally, I hope it stays that way. These are big investments and buyers need the opportunity to vet properties inside and out. This market also produces a number of site-unseen offers (often there is no choice with the quick timing of things) and I believe it would be unreasonable for sellers to expect buyers to waive contingencies altogether as a result.

There are a handful of other negotiating tips and tricks like escalation clauses and the like, and there’s a time and place for different tactics to achieve maximum results. I know I sound like a scumbag real estate agent when I say this, but as mentioned above, it’s absolutely paramount to have a local agent that has a close ear to the ground.

It will be fun to come back to this article 2 years from now!

Recent Testimonials